From f9fdd526d50a5e09e640cc4c3cc37b4288900da2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my=20Zurcher?= <jeremy@asynk.ch>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2022 12:54:11 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fix portal_occlusion_culler compilation with target=debug
 tools=no

---
 servers/visual/portals/portal_occlusion_culler.cpp | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/servers/visual/portals/portal_occlusion_culler.cpp b/servers/visual/portals/portal_occlusion_culler.cpp
index 9ab212698b7..16f61ffd822 100644
--- a/servers/visual/portals/portal_occlusion_culler.cpp
+++ b/servers/visual/portals/portal_occlusion_culler.cpp
@@ -606,8 +606,10 @@ void PortalOcclusionCuller::whittle_polys() {
 						// yes .. we can remove this poly .. but do not muck up the iteration of the list
 						//print_line("poly is occluded " + itos(t));
 
+#ifdef TOOLS_ENABLED
 						// this condition should never happen, we should never be checking occludee against itself
 						DEV_ASSERT(_polys[t].poly_source_id != _polys[n].poly_source_id);
+#endif
 
 						// unordered remove
 						_polys[t] = _polys[_num_polys - 1];